Abstract: Journal of Sexual Health and AIDS Research

Abstract:
The selection of healthy finishing materials is emerging as a critical pillar for sustainable construction, given the evidence that traditional materials contribute 20-30% of indoor air pollution and approximately 40% of glob al CO₂ emissions. This article analyzes material innovations that balance functionality, aesthetics, and health, based on a systematic review of 85 Scopus Q1-indexed studies (2020-2024) and representative case studies. Methodology: A mixed-method approach was employed: Systematic review of scientific literature (Scopus, Web of Science) using keywords: healthy building materials, VOCs, sustainable finishes, indoor air quality (2019-2024). Comparative life cycle analysis (LCA) of 15 traditional vs. sustainable materials. Evaluation of case studies in the UK and EU using air quality, carbon footprint, and cost metrics. Discussion and Results, Innovations, and Environmental Impact: Advanced Materials: Self-healing concrete reduces maintenance costs by 35% (ACI Ma terials Journal, 2023). Transparent wood reduces energy use in lighting by 25%. Emission Reduction: Recycled steel and bamboo reduce CO₂ emissions by 50-70% compared to traditional alternatives. Health and Wellness: Materials with <50 μg/m³ of VOCs reduce childhood asthma by 45% (WHO, 2022). Moisture-regulating coatings (hydroceramics) reduce respiratory allergies by 30%. Barriers to Adoption: 68% of builders cite the lack of stan dardized data as the main obstacle (Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023), while the perceived cost of sustainable materials exceeds the actual cost by 15-20%. The transition to healthy finishing materials is technically feasible and environmentally imperative. The integration of certifications (LEED, Cradle to Cradle), digital technologies (BIM), and economic incentive policies will accelerate their adoption. It is urgent to overcome informational and economic barriers to scale solutions that improve human health and climate resilience.