Abstract:
Will the future of humanity still be a history of wars? Or does the future hold for us a scenario of greater solidarity and rejection of war? Are we really at the end of the history of wars? Perhaps the explanation could be defined by alternatives, nuclear war or war ban. Since the first alternative, the apocalypse, is to be discarded, all that remains is the possible alternative; Future without war! Yet, we are in a period of dissemination of local wars, starting from Ukraine to the Gaza Strip, beyond the forgotten wars in Africa and the Caucasus. The scenario before us does not confirm the thesis. The theme of rejecting war is not for today, but for a not-too-distant future singularly linked to global warming and the desired neutrality. A danger for all humanity and which must be resolved not by individual states and territories but by the entire world community. Help must come from science and research without borders and from a progressive adaptation of social classes, now segmented by prestige some money. A selfish social structure that is not suited to solving global problems. Giving emphasis to science and research, necessary to contain global warming, also means giving primacy to knowledge and not to accumulated money. A more supportive world is a good start on the path to rejecting war. We must then remember that the search for full neutrality of human life on the planet also involves reaching the goal of a constant and immutable balance of the economy. An ideal goal, today but achievable, but possible in the not-too-distant future. On the other hand, a world that is more supportive of the looming threat, which is influenced by the technology that unites human beings, is certainly a good viaticum so that the essential matters of the economy and life are entrusted to the direct responsibility of the community. A necessary evolution for civilizations of ancient or more ancient democracy. Let us not forget that communities or, rather, their majorities are the core of democracy and that the power of majorities finds its basis in the universal laws of the Universe around us. As if to say that the world is inexorably moving towards a democratic civilization, with the issues of war subjected to the decisions (direct democracy) of the communities, which are the pillars on which the life of future generations rests. Let’s not forget that accelerating science and research will bring advantages for labor productivity and greater resources. Surpluses of goods and products will be created which will be able to give impetus to societies that are lagging behind on the path to development. Importantly, the objective of full neutrality must be achieved together by human communities, never in separate groups, because the theme of full neutrality with the nature around us is unique for humanity