Abstract:
This paper will provide a detailed comparison between diaphragmatic breathing and instinctive breathing. The comparative methodology will be supported by two sample subjects, one person who has started vocal technique training and is currently working with diaphragmatic breathing, and another subject who has no knowledge on the topic and performs instinctive breathing for physiological functioning. The thesis of the comparative viewpoints will be unfolded through the following questions:- What are the effective and positive aspects of diaphragmatic breathing, and what is its visible impact?- The importance of its correct usage and training for interpreting dramatic pieces on stage or delivering speeches and public appearances across various media.- Breath control as a key to achieving successful performance—free of panting, gasping, or irregular breathing and exhalation patterns—also directly relates to the concrete work with the material being interpreted or read.- The training journey toward achieving breath control and managing it across a range of physical and stage activities, whether in rehearsal or during live performance.- The importance of body posture and preparatory exercises at different stages of the breathing process. The aim of the paper is to provide a professional overview of the initiation of a working method toward full breath ing through exercises and training sessions, using a comparative format that promotes effective stage and public speaking. The topic and the study are inspired by the misuse of language and the speech apparatus in stage and public discourse